Business
Choosing an engineering partner for a tech project in Japan
Three models for getting a product built in Japan, six questions to ask before signing, the red flags. The decision guide for choosing an engineering partner in Tokyo.
Three models, three trade-offs
When a Western company wants to have a product developed in Japan, it generally has three options.
The local Japanese IT firm knows the market, but often works in Japanese, with processes and a project culture that can surprise a Western team. Distant offshore (India, Eastern Europe) is cost-competitive, but the time difference with Tokyo is brutal and the link to the Japanese market is non-existent. The tri-geo studio combines a presence in Tokyo with synchronized hubs elsewhere: it’s Abbeal’s model, and it has its limits too — you need a project that justifies the time-zone overlap.
None is “the best.” The right choice depends on your project.
Six questions to ask before signing
- Who actually writes the code? Ask for named profiles and their seniority. A serious partner shows them.
- What is the working language? If your team doesn’t speak Japanese, check the real level of English, not the sales promise.
- How much time-zone overlap with your teams? Put a number on it. Three to four hours a day changes everything compared to zero.
- Who holds the contract and compliance? In Japan, the legal entity that signs the contract matters. Check that it exists.
- What happens after the POC? The real work starts at production: monitoring, recovery, run.
- Can you talk to a reference client? If not, that’s a signal.
The red flags
A partner that won’t show its engineers. A “yes” to every question with no nuance. A brilliant demo with no discussion of operations. A quote that doesn’t separate build and run. A sales contact who has never seen the code.
Where Abbeal stands
We’ve operated a hub in Tokyo since 2018, with bilingual senior engineers. We hold the contract through Abbeal KK, the Japanese entity. We’ve delivered for Money Forward, Le Monde, among others. The tri-geo model makes sense if you want a local presence in Tokyo without giving up the link to your European or North American teams. It makes less sense if your project is purely local and fits in a single time zone. We’ll tell you so.
// Read next
Business
Output-based vs Time & Material: why we killed T&M at Abbeal.
78% of Abbeal portfolio runs on Output-based pricing in 2026. Gross margin +18 pts, NPS +24, engagement length ×1.7. How we operate and 3 success conditions.
11 min
Business
Montréal: the hub linking Europe and North America
Montréal is not a representative office: it's the North American link that completes Follow-the-Sun. Time-zone bridge, bilingual teams, Law 25 compliance.
4 min
